NO. 16CR0129
 
STATE OF TEXAS	§	IN THE DISTRICT COURT	
 	§	 	
vs.	§	10th JUDICIAL DISTRICT	
 	§	 	
ROBERT WESLEY FAIRCLOTH	§	GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS	

O R D E R GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 
On                   ____________, 2016, came on to be heard Defendant's Motion For Protective Order, and after hearing same, the Court GRANTS this Order.   The Court finds and Orders                                        that the prosecutors of the Galveston County Criminal District Attorney’s Office SHALL NOT:
1.	 Approach the court ex parte. 
2.	Violate the rights of the Defendant under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) The Michael Morton act, also known as TCCP Art. 39.14, Texas Rules of Professional Responsibility 3.04 and 3.09(d), the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, Article I, Sections 10 and 19 of the Constitution of the State of Texas.
3.	Delay the disclosure to the defense of any Brady material.
4.	Attempt to intimidate the counsel for defense from vigorously defending her client in accordance with the duties imposed on her by the laws of this nation and this state. 
5.	Withdraw of plea bargain offers or any other negative consequences if the defendant asserts rights guaranteed under the Constitution and laws. 
6.	Condition the disclosure of evidence or information the State has a duty to disclose on the compliance by defense counsel of any conditions requested by the prosecution including but not limited to the GCCDAO Protective Order.
7.	Intentionally delay any proceeding to wear the Defendant down to take an offer to just get out of jail. 

PRESIDING JUDGE